How to be Involved in Program Evaluation by McNeil Keith Download PDF EPUB FB2
Program evaluation is essential to public health. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sets standards for evaluation, develops evaluation tools and resources, and provides support for evaluation capacity-building. The authors of How to be Involved in Program Evaluation make clear the purpose of evaluation, the need for evaluation and the role of the program director in initiating positive evaluation.
They have developed a general evaluation model that can be used for assessing an individual progam or.
Evaluation is a systematic process to understand what a program does and how well the program does it. Evaluation results can be used to maintain or improve program quality and to ensure that future planning can be more evidence-based.
Evaluation constitutes part of an ongoing cycle of program planning, implementation, and improvement (Patton File Size: KB.
Browse How to be Involved in Program Evaluation book videos. Playing next. Program evaluation is a systematic method for collecting, analyzing, and using information to answer questions about projects, policies and programs, particularly about their effectiveness and efficiency.
In both the public and private sectors, stakeholders often want to know whether the programs they are funding, implementing, voting for, receiving or objecting to are producing the intended. The goal of program evaluation is to inform the program development process. Program evaluation planning is critical an evaluation is efficient and effective in measuring the key variables that will provides the information needed to describe actual program delivery methods, audience reached and outcomes.
steps in assessing the feasibility of conducting a program evaluation, and conclude with the five key steps in doing and reporting an evaluation.
Program evaluation is a rich and varied combination of theory and practice. It is widely used in public, nonprofit, and private sector organizations to create information for plan. community organizations and constituents who are involved with the program. In general, evaluation questions fall into these groups: • Implementation.
Were your program’s activities put into place as originally intended. • Effectiveness. Is your program achieving the goals and objectives it was intended to accomplish. • Efficiency. In its broadest meaning, to evaluate means to ascertain the worth of or to fix a value on some object.
In this book, we use evaluation in a more restricted sense, as program evaluation or interchangeably as evaluation research, defined as a social science activity directed at collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information about the. A program with an evaluation plan also can benefit from an evaluability assessment, which can gauge how well the evaluation plan was put into action and its effectiveness in preparing the program for an evaluation.
An evaluability assessment analyzes a program's goals, state of implementation, data capacity and measurable outcomes. Input should be sought from all of those involved and affected by the evaluation such as students, parents, teachers, program staff, or community members.
One way to ensure your evaluation is inclusive is by following the practice of participatory evaluation. Questions about why your evaluation is being done and how the information will be used should be discussed among a variety of program staff, and any other individuals who may be involved in the evaluation to ensure there is consensus as to what the evaluation will acc omplish.
Given the complexity of the program evaluation process, planning represents the single most important stage in effective program evaluation.
Decisions made in the planning process will guide all other stages by defining the methodology and scope of the inquiry and by creating shared evaluation processes and documents. Books on evaluation. This page provides a gateway to books from The books featured here are ones that have interested me, and that are in keeping with the aims and topics on this site.
There are, of course, an enormous number of good books out there, so please use the search box below and look around. If the evaluation results suggest that a program is not as successful as desired, all should be involved in brainstorming solutions.
This is not a time for performance appraisal or criticism of program staff. Such an approach to program evaluation yields several additional benefits. – Program resources (e.g., financial, necessary computer software, etc.) – Specific program requirements (e.g., AmeriCorps grantees ≥ $, are required to conduct an independent evaluation) – May consider a hybrid approach that have an interest in or could be affected by the program evaluation They can be people who are involved in program operations, people who are served or affected by the program, or the primary users of the evaluation The inclusion of stake-holders in an evaluation not only helps build support for the evaluation but.
Program Evaluation –MMWR, Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health S tand ard s U tility Feas ibility Prop riety A ccuracy Engage s takehold ers S tep s D es cribe the p rogram G ather cred ible evid ence Focus the Evaluation d es ign J us tify conclus ions Ens ure us e.
risks may be involved, and that their participation is voluntary. This may require the use of an interpreter The evaluation of a program by those directly affected, and conducting the program.
Self-evaluation is highly recommended in community development evalua-tion. But, nonprofit program evaluation doesn’t need to be intensive to be valuable. Simply put, program evaluation is nothing more than a systematic method for collecting, analyzing, and using information to answer basic questions about a program.
And, as Lava Mae’s example demonstrates, an effective evaluation can begin with something as simple. Books shelved as evaluation: Utilization-Focused Evaluation by Michael Quinn Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods by Michael Quinn Patton, D. References to program evaluation methods frequently include the phrase "qualitative and quantitative methods," as if the mention of one method demands the inclusion of the other.
Although methodological diversity in evaluation is widely accepted, and even recommended by. The lack of teaching cases in program evaluation is often cited as a gap in the field. This ground-breaking book fills this gap, covering the essentials of program evaluation as it is used in education and with a wide variety of evaluation projects to be discussed, analyzed, and reflected upon.
The book covers the essentials of program evaluation, including foundation and types of evaluation. program or not program, and may be unethical to randomly assign someone to no treatment.
Randomly assigning people to be in the program is not how programs really work, so results of the evaluation may not apply to the program as it really exists. Can't be applied to causes that operate over the long term or to programs that are very complex.
Realistic Evaluation. Realistic Evaluation shows how program evaluation needs to be, and can be bettered. It presents a profound yet highly readable critique of current evaluation practice, and goes on to introduce a manifesto' and handbook' for a fresh approach.
The main body of this book is devoted to the articulation of a new evaluation paradigm, which promises greater validity and. organization is one in which many people are consulted and involved in decision- making, then a participant-focused evaluation might be the best approach.
The basic issue is alignment. The evaluation approach you choose should be aligned with the purposes of the evaluation and the philosophy and values of your organization. When I taught a graduate course in program evaluation, I used an earlier edition of this book.
It served as a text very nicely. It explores such key issues, at the outset, as planning an evaluation, developing good measures of program performance, and ethical issues involved/5(5).
Process evaluation, or how the program addresses the problem, what it does, what the program services are and how the program operates. Process evaluation questions focus on how a program is working, program performance, and involve extensive monitoring.
Similarly, formative evaluation questions look at whether program activities occur. Evaluation has become an essential process for nonprofits, You might not use the same type of evaluation tool or technique for assessing the outcome of a new program that you would use to determine the effectiveness of management functions like fund development.
Evaluation is not a one-size-fits all process. iii Contents Message from the Director-General v About this handbook vii PART ONE. PRINCIPLES AND ORGANIZATION 1 Chapter 1.
Evaluation in WHO 1 Definition and principles of evaluation 1 Evaluation culture and organizational learning 4 Participatory approach 5 Integration of cross-cutting corporate strategies: gender, equity and human rights 5. The resources devoted to each evaluation should be commensurate with the size and importance of expenditure involved.
As a major purpose of project evaluation is to improve value for money, the cost of project evaluation must be balanced against the benefits of improved decision making.
The resources allocated to a project.Buy The Book! Good Evaluation Criteria. or at least more useful and less useful ones. The characteristics of good evaluation criteria are (adapted from Keeney and Gregory, ): in that consequences and trade-offs can be understood and communicated by everyone involved.
Practical, meaning that information can practically be obtained to.This guide offers a variety of program evaluation-related information. Chapter 3 of the GAO Designing Evaluations handbook focuses on the process of selecting an evaluation design. This handbook provided by the U.S.
Government Accountability Office provides information on various topics related to program evaluation.